PUBLIC HEARING - July 3

There will be a public hearing on July 3 at 4 pm at the Gold Bridge Community Club to deal with the Tyax Wilderness Resort rezoning (info at the link just below).  The public hearing will also be dealing with some housekeeping changes as a result of splitting the Area A and Area B bylaw.  Please feel free to call or email me up to the end of the Public Hearing on July 3 after which I cannot receive any new information.  Also note that Norm Verner, my alternate will be attending this hearing as well.

Additionally we will be dealing with the Medical Marijuana zoning.  For those of you that haven't been following this issue, the Federal Government has changed the way medical marijuana can be grown and distributed.  The Federal Government now issues licences to specific operators and those operators are building facilities of various size, shapes and descriptions.  Naturally this concerns the public a great deal and therefore local governments have been trying to figure out how to deal with it.  In the case of the SLRD we are recommending that we "zone" for them, i.e. say where they can go, rather than not zone (which would allow them basically to go anywhere).    The 4 Electoral Areas of the SLRD are pretty consistent on their recommendations, for Area A the proposal is that medical marijuana facilities be allowed in industrial and resource zones with minimum sizes of .5 ha and 10 ha respectively.  Please remember this is just a proposal, that is what Public Hearings are for - to hear from you!  There has been a fair amount of information circulated (two people provided feedback) and a public information meeting (noone attended).

Medical Marijuana Regulations History
Tyax Wilderness Resort & other Zoning Amendment changes

Our Favorite Topic - the Hurley River Rd.
As most of you know, as a result of much letter writing from property owners and businesses in the area the provincial government has returned the Hurley River Rd. to MOFLNRO as a Forest Service Road.  This excludes the East Hurley. This is a positive step and one that I hopes returns us to the adequate maintenance of the road we used to enjoy before the middle part went to MOTi.   In fitting into MOTi's classification system, that middle part of the road only received one grade per year compared the often two it received in previous years under MOFLNRO.

The challenge, as we all saw, is that in attempting to fit this change into their static budget, they chose to remove the spring opening.

We finally were able to have a teleconference with the two MLAs and I do appreciate that MLA Sturdy apologized for the lack of two way communication on this issue that resulted in some general misunderstandings.  For me, MLA Tegart and MLA Sturdy have taken an active interest and made a concerted effort to improve the situation and I do think that over time the return of the road to FSR status will assist.  And I thank them greatly, the Hurley River Rd. is a CRITICAL piece of infrastructure for this area. Critical.

So what was the misunderstanding?  The MLAs seem to think they are getting mixed messages from this community. Now that I have taken some time to reflect and think on this..... I do not agree.   What was being asked for was a return to previous levels of overall maintenance (and that includes and has included for years the spring opening).  This community is pretty clear on what they want, they want a reasonably maintained road that is opened at the earliest possible date (and most have expressed the need for reasonableness cost wise in that).  That could mean a somewhat increased budget as the costs of doing this rise but the total budget has remained the same and herein lies the rub.  For the MLAs and government they were attempting to undertake this within the set out budget and that is pretty darned difficult to grade the entire road twice, the hills one or two more times AND do the spring opening (avg. is about $30k per year, this year lower, low snow pack) all with a budget of around $67k total.  I'd also like to say that the total historical actual expenditures for  the entire road maintenance (including spring opening) is quite difficult to get clarified.  I suspect when we boil it down to hard facts and budget numbers we will see that overall we have received a cut in total real $ cut in budget through the years.

So...we have a dilemna.  I volunteered in our teleconference meeting with the MLAS, because they think they are getting mixed messages from the community, to develop a survey to lay out options within the budget as it currently exists and to have the community and the MLAs agree to the contents & to abide by the results.    However, I also think that we are being forced to accept a cut in maintenance by choosing either/or within a budget amount.  More maintenance/less or no spring opening or spring opening and less maintenance.

The MOFLNRO roads people tell me they plan to grade the entire road twice & the hills perhaps once/twice more.  The figures put in the press release and bandied about are for the middle section that was MOTi and there is approximately $80 k in there that is intended for road bed improvements this year.  Another very positive aspect that go lost in the foo fer ah over the spring opening.

Next steps:
1. I am going to form a small advisory committee of various types of users/points of view
2. I am going to stay in touch with MOFLNRO roads person and get exact budgetary figures for this years maintenance (will get this in the fall) for the ENTIRE road one end to the other
3. I will be speaking with both MLAs about the dilemna as I see it and reminding them of the history of maintenance on this road.

In the meantime, the Hurley FSR for the Hurley FSR is in pretty good shape.  MOFLNRO hired a grader that is appropriate and experienced and I think he did the best job he can with what he has to work with.  Enjoy!!!

Thank you to everyone who wrote and phoned and wrote and phoned, with a bunch of blogging, Facebooking and Twittering thrown in there.  This issue is one that resonantes with many property owners and it showed and you know what, it made a difference!!!!  Way to go!!!

Road 40 Carpenter Lake Rd.
Background/Previous Blog on Erosion Issues
NEW!!   MOTi received approval this spring from the Water Stewardship Division of FLNRO to place, surplus material generated by ditching, at four locations alongside Carpenter lake this year, to address some longstanding erosion concerns. These works have been taking place recently so that  the environmental windows that have been identified can be adhered to.

With regards to the condition of Rd. 40 , MOTi  will be expending close to $800,000 on resurfacing 4 km of Road 40 west of the Bridge River bridge combined with some minor widening of a rock cut near Apple springs. The work at Apple springs is still in the engineering phase, however it remains MOTi Area Managers intent to address this location during this construction season. 

I wrote the following letter that summarizes quite a number of concerns related to Rd. 40.

The Assistant District Manager and Area Manager came out to meet with me with regard to these issues.  I am awaiting their written response to the discussion and will update everyone soon.  The link to the letter is here:  Road40LetterMay282014

Bralorne Sewer - CCTV Study
Spoke briefly to staff and this CCTV study has been completed.  Generally it turned out some areas of the system that are better than thought and some areas that need immediate attention.  I will let everyone know once I have the specifics and the staff recommendations what the next steps will be.

Bralorne Water
As an FYI, staff advises that the project to replace the remainder of the wood stave water pipe in Bralorne is in the tendering phase and they plan to have a recommendation report to the SLRD Board in late July.

Tyax Wilderness Resort Rezoning & Other Items

REZONING:  Tyax Wilderness Resort
First & second reading were given by SLRD Board on May 26.  Tyax has put up notification signs.
Unofficially, the public hearing will be held on July 3.  Notices etc. will be out shortly.

Here is the information on the current rezoning:   Tyax Wilderness Resort Rezoning - information link

At the same time (July 3) will be a public hearing for some housekkeeping changes to the Area A Zoning Bylaws.  Link to that information is at:   Area A Zoning Bylaw Changes

OCP Change & Rezoning:  Gun Lake - Kier Property
The staff have been directed to prepare the bylaws on this one.
Link to Information:   Kier Property Information

Gun Lake West Rec Site Campground - Douglas Fir Bark Beetles Infested Trees
It was brought to my attention that there are several trees (probably more now) infected by Douglas Fir Bark Beetle in the campground on Gun Lake.  Neighbors were concerned because these beetles could fly and infect/kill trees on their property.

I followed up first with the Rec Site & Trails Technician for the area, was not satisfied with his response so went to his manager.  Here is the response:

"From talking to Bruce Morrow, this is the situation with the large dead fir at Gun Lake West:

-          The trees are infested with fir bark beetle but there many more trees in the area similarly infested. Treating these 4 trees to kill the bark beetle would not have a significant impact on the population of bark beetle in the area.

-          The fir bark beetle flight is expected to happen in July. The infestation has been erratic, and its spread is unpredictable. It is very strange that the beetles attacked such large old trees with thick bark.

-          The dead trees will become danger trees, mainly because of the huge branches. Bruce confirmed that addressing this issue will be complicated and expensive, and require a high level of expertise.

So we have a serious but not an urgent issue to deal with. Ed will be back to work later this work; I will touch base with him and we will look at the options available to us. I would appreciate if you could keep us informed of other forest management work taking place in the area."

In other words they are in no hurry to do anything at this Rec Site.  I have followed up with him and he now advises (May27) that he will send out someone to have a look.  I also put him together with the Entomologist.    If you are not happy with this response and feel there should be a higher priority response here is the contact info:

Bruce Petch

Regional Manager

Recreation Sites and Trails BC

Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations

3rd Floor, 441 Columbia Street, Kamloops BC V2C 2T3

tel. 250-828-4441

email Bruce.Petch@gov.bc.ca'

Douglas Fir Bark Beetle Infested Trees

Links to previous information shared

Gun Lake Ratepayers Assoc. has also done some homework with the Regional Entomologist, Lorraine MacLaughlin on this and has provided some excellent information at:
https://www.facebook.com/notes/gun-lake-community/douglas-fir-bark-beetle-qa/1429566267304758

Our favorite topic...the road issue that never ends & More

As I post this blog, Sunday May 11 I know everyone including myself would like to know exactly the details of the future maintenance and upkeep of the Hurley River Rd.  When I know something factual and complete (i.e. not little birdies chirping) I will update this blog.  

May 12.  The official word is out, see it and take survey and say what you think.  http://isurvivedthehurley.com/?p=1329

FIRE SEASON:  SPRINKLER PROGRAM INITIATED

The Electoral Area Directors of the SLRD have approved the initiation of a household roofline sprinkler program.  Roofline sprinklers have been shown to be very effective during interface wildfires.  The suggested approach would allow residents to order sprinklers either in person, from  the SLRD office in Pemberton, or online, using the SLRD website and a PayPal overlay. Once a number of orders has been received, the  SLRD would then bulk order sprinkler units from a local supplier, at a reduced cost-by-volume, and  residents could pick them up from the SLRD office along with simple, step-by-step installation instructions. Local fire halls could also be designated as pick-up locations. 

Information from the SLRD meeting here:

SLRD REPORT ON FIRE SPRINKLERS

Lots more information to come!

GOLD BRIDGE WATER 

Regional District Services cover specific taxpayers or areas.    They may take a number of forms to raise revenue, taxation via an amount/$1000 of assessment, a parcel tax and/or user fees amongst other mechanisms.

When I came on as Regional District Director in 2011, a new water system had been installed.  I almost immediately received many phone calls about the degree of chlorine in the water, the smell etc.

As I delved into the history and issues with this service a multitude of challenges started to crop up.  I want to say from the outset that this is not casting any shadow on Russ Oakley.  He lead the appropriate and needed process to put a proper water system in place.

Here are some links to detailed information regarding this service and its issues.
Info on New Pump (2012)
Info from SLRD Dir. Utilities on previous water pump
Information on Gold Bridge Water

Goldbridge Budget 2014
Information #2 on Gold Bridge Water

Last year, the SLRD Board in its application for regionally significant Gas Tax Funds applied for and received about $45,000 to install a larger pump.  This has occurRed.  This seems to have rectified the chlorine issues and should decrease some operational costs and that has been budgeted for.

The challenge remains the overall financial viability of this service.  As you may be aware, Regional Districts can not move money around as municipalities can.  Money that is taxed for for a service must remain and be used by that service.  So money in has to cover the money out.  The problem with this service is that, as of today, where we stand it is barely breaking even and there are no funds going into reserves.  We have instituted user fees which will help on the revenue side and I have been successful in getting the Board to agree to set aside the increase each year in BC Hydro PILT funds to a fund for Area A, B & Lilllooet's use. Unfortunately they have been as yet unable to agree on how to divide this fund up between the 3 of us, however it is fully my attention that $5,000 a year of this fund will go to this service for some time to build up the reserve.  This will eliminate the necessity to increase either the parcel taxes or the user fees or both.  Please stand by on this.  In the meantime I am looking at other funding sources to top up the reserves even if it is just this year or for a couple of years.  Please bear with me I am working on this.

  As always let me know what I or the SLRD staff can do.  We are more than willing to explain and listen.

Gold Bridge School Field Completion

As a result of a meeting with the Board of Education last year, I committed $5,000 SLRD Area A funds to partner with a funding application to the School Connections Fund ($15,000).  The School District also used some of their maintenance budget. The School Connections fund is primarily intended to link local government and school districts to work on projects that benefit both the public and students.  The entire project was funded including removal of trees and installation of an irrigation system.

Some people asked me if it was being left as it is, so I called the School Principal, Patrice Barth who advised that the School District Maintenance department will be reseeding the field this spring.

REZONINGS COMING SOON
Tyax Wilderness Lodge
Tyax has revised and resubmitted their rezoning application.  It will come to the SLRD Board Meeting at the end of May.  If readings are given, a public hearing date will be set.

I have asked staff and will be asking the Board to support:
1. Signage be required on the site immediately
2. One month's full notice of the Public Hearing be given

As this has not gone to a Board meeting yet I cannot provide any detailed information, other than to say that Tyax has removed the main lodge site from application as well as lot 6/.  The new application contains just Lot 5 directly south which will contain a multi-unit staff accomodation.  The same types of restrictive convenants as were being required on the previous application are likely going to be, where still appropriate, required.

KIER'S PROPERTY - GUN LAKE

As most of you know Helen Kier passed away last year.  The family has brought forward an application to subdivide the property for each child.  This will require an OCP amendment as well as a rezoning.

Please see the map at this link: Map - Kier Property OCP and Rezoning

If you have any thoughts/questions let me know.  

Bralorne Water System:

The last of the historic wood stave water piping will be replaced in Bralorne this summer. The replacement program includes replacing up to 330m of pipe along Hawkes Avenue and installing new service connections and valves to the property lines. Currently the project is in the design phase, with TRUE Consulting providing this service. The next phase will be the production of tender documents and procurement of a contractor. The project should be completed by October 31, 2014. 

Bralorne Sewer System:

An investigation into the state of repair of the sewer pipes in Bralorne will happen this summer. We plan to do a closed circuit television (CCTV) inspection. Results from this inspection will provide the SLRD with an overall state of health of the system which can be used to strengthen future grant applications. Approximately $25,000 has been put aside to do this funding.  The federal government has announced that Gas Tax Funding will be available once again; an announcement with details regarding the next application uptake is expected soon.

Gold Bridge Transfer Station:

1.    RV Sani-Dump Access: Soon there will be RV access to the septage pits at the Gold Bridge Transfer Station. After exploring a number of alternatives and engaging the Ministry of Environment, the SLRD has confirmed that the septage pits can accommodate the expected volumes from recreational vehicles. Provided the volume remains below 100m3 per year, the transfer station will be operating within its permit. SLRD Staff will be required to monitor the disposal rates and collect user information. 

2.    The Printed Paper & Packaging (PPP) Stewardship Program starts May 14, 2014: The Lillooet Landfill is registered as a designated collection facility. This means that the landfill will receive payment from the program service provider, Multi Materials BC (MMBC), based on the weight of material collected. The Gold Bridge Transfer Station will receive a portion of that funding for all properly sorted and clean PPP materials that are taken from the transfer station to Lillooet. Watch for pamphlets and signage that will be appearing soon at the Transfer Station. The more recycling collected means lower costs to landfill, and more funds flowing back into the operating budget.

A note from Kara Socket provided the following information: 
      The recycle program will continue to evolve, the response has been fantastic and although I don't have hard statistics to offer, I know that the trailer when loaded, holds about a ton or 2,000 lbs of recycling.  In summer I'm hauling at least monthly, sometimes more and in winter, about every 6 weeks.  I'd say that we're probably recycling up to 25,000 lbs a year!  Awesome!

BC Hydro announcements regarding LaJoie Dam and Downton Reservoir

Links to look at:  Downton Reservoir Levels to be reduce

Lillooet News Article:  http://www.lillooetnews.net/news/local/bc-hydro-ramps-up-plans-to-upgrade-bridge-river-system-1.1052769

I have talked to BC Hydro officials and we are hoping to have a community meeting to provide more information soon.

BC Hydro is in the process of evaluating what to do about the LaJoie Dam.  Once that is decided it will be a medium-long term process to do the operational planning/budget etc.  

This year, if approved, there will be some operational modifications.

In addition, planning is under way as per the link to reduce the level of the Downton Reservoir.

Please be cautious in drawing conclusions from the Lillooet News article and I am attempting to get our business owners/operators and others the ability to speak to BC Hydro officials directly at a meeting.

More to come!

GUN LAKE:  Mowing Vanderburgh Hill , Lakeview Rd. & W.Gun Lake Rd.

Last year I pursued Interior Roads to mow Lakeview Rd. &
W. Gun Lake Rd. due to the invasion of Canada Thistle (invasive)
 we found the previous year.  At first told not in their contract, they found the budget to ensure the road was mowed and mowed early.  Thank You Interior Roads!

Then later in the year, oh my goodness the weeds along the side of Vanderburgh Hill were really bad and I contacted IRL again.  They dealt with it.

I was back at it questioning again this spring and received this response;

"The mowing of Gun Lake West road up to Lake View including Vandenberg hill and Lakeview road to Saddle road will be done by our mowing contractor.  This is what we eventually did last year and this will be scheduled every year from now on.  I will have Don McMahon watch to make sure they do this area."

A small bit of progress.  Smile.

GUN LAKE:  Slim Creek Connector to Rd. 40

The bottom part of that road where it joins Rd. 40 has a slide on it and it covers up that road, makes it somewhat impassable every year.

That part of the road is a Licensee Road - Aspen Planers.

The SLRD Emergency Program Manager and the RPF that did the  Fuel Mitigation strategy have both indicated that a 2nd emergency exit from the Gun Lake area would be a good thing. This is because the highest likelihood of a fire comes from the south/south-west right where the road leading into Gun Lake is.

So I talked to the MOF Roads guy who talked to the Aspen Planers roads guy and voila (sort of):

      "I have asked Tom Illidge to run out and clean up the slough along the lower portion of the Slim creek road and get it open for the long weekend. As you have most likely heard from Ken, this is a road permit road and Aspen is not obligated to maintain it to a two wheel drive standard or keep it open for the general public all year long and if it closes throughout the seasons, we may not want to open it, we may just post it as closed.

If the Gun Lake association or SLRD is willing to maintain this road, we could enter into a Road Maintenance Agreement that would allow a secondary user to complete maintenance legally. This would mean that Aspen sets the minimum standards which would include requirements of the maintainer to be covered by worksafe bc, have general liability and comprehensive insurance including firefighting coverage of $250,000 minimum and also be approved by aspen for this type of work. It is important to note that the maintainer does not create any environmental or safety hazards and is cognizant of the Highway junction  and the hazards associated with this. We cannot have the material pushed over the bank onto the edge of Highway 40 and expect the MOTi to manage it for us. And to work on the travelled portion of Highway 40 requires permits and approvals from the MOTi representative"

This work was done this last week and the bottom part is in good driveable condition.

Big thanks to Aspen Planers for this donation to assist the safety of the Gun Lake community.  It is much appreciated!  Now to figure out next year......

Marshall Lake Area :  Forestry Concerns
I went out last week to support an Area A property owner in his effort to work with Interwest to mitigate his concerns regarding harvesting immediately in and around his property.

     . It has been a month's long effort with the property owner repeatedly communicating his concerns to Interwest. Meeting started out very testy with the Interwest rep saying that Interwest had done what they "have to" and thats it.

After some pretty darned direct conversation, the Interwest rep agreed to do a tour and committed to some specific mitigations in the key problem areas. Later on he also said he could have communicated in a more open manner and told the owner long ago that he would come out and work on specific issues/mitigations.. Geesh, so much effort and needing to go cap in hand and beg , something is wrong with our forest policy when it leaves a property owner in this situation. Anyways it turned out well so thats the main thing and I hope this forms a better basis for understanding on Interwest's part going forward. The proof will be in the pudding all around

Marshall Lake:  Log Hauling Starts Soon

We have known all winter that log hauling was going to commence this spring on the Marshall Lake Rd.

Property owners are super concerned about that bottom part of the road before it joins Rd. 40.

I and John Parrott, MLRA president and others have been working hard to bring awareness of the safety issues to the MOTi, the road contractor IRL, Interwest and their contractors.  We even had a video made (thank you Kenneth Walker) that we circulated to the ministries and so on.

It has been a continuous process of followup.  So far property owners are still not completely satisfied, but I can say Interior Roads has done an absolutely stellar job of preparing that road for the hauling.  They have found every way to eek out some width.  The road itself has been graded and honed into fantastic condition.  Well done Interior Roads, well done!

We have asked for signage, any kind of signage warning folks of the danger.  And I have sent emails to property owners encouraging them to slow down and take care this summer.  We are hoping MOTi can do something and just this past week Interwest has indicated they will put up signage if MOTi doesn't.

I was very pleased and honored after all this to be extended an invitation to attend the Marshall Lake Ratepayers Picnic this summer - thank you so much- and I received this very nice email from one fellow-

"Debbie—on behalf of myself and my family, I would like to thank you for all your time and attention to the issues brought on by the logging in our little piece of heaven (Marshall Lake). And I agree that Interior Roads has done an outstanding job on the road to Marshall Lake.

Our family has been on the lake since 1962, and like you, just love every minute that we can get at the lake.

We have followed your blogs to date, and want to thank you for your very professional, concerned efforts to ensure that our voices have been heard with the logging contractors, elected  provincial officials, and public employees. Thank-you again, and please continue to keep us informed through your emails"

I don't do this for thank you's, I do it for satisfaction that I can help this area.  But its nice all the same to get this very nice thought.  

Change.org Petition.

You may have recently seen a Petition on Change.org making some requests of me as the Area A Director on a personal matter of an individual who resides in this area.  I am not going to go into a lot of details other than to say this involves a period of time about 3 years ago in which I was appointed by the Bridge River Valley Economic Development Society as their executive director (which I removed myself from several months before taking on the Regional District Director role).  The matter is therefore, if needed, for comment by that organization and not by me personally as I was acting on their behalf.

I called the RCMP and they advise that the file mentioned was closed in September 2011 after the actions agreed upon with the RCMP were taken by the Bridge River Valley Economic Development Society.

Downton Reservoir to be kept at a reduced elevation level for 10-15 years

Downton Reservoir to be kept at a reduced elevation level for 10-15 years

I have received this letter this morning and will be following up in order to determine the various implications for our community.

Dear Ms. Demare, Mr. Verner and Ms. Tegart,

This message is to advise you of potential operational changes for the Downton Reservoir in the Bridge-Seton system, which could result in a lowering of the reservoir level for a 10-15 year period.  No decisions have yet been made to proceed, pending further discussions with St’at’imc (as per the St’at’imc Hydro Agreement), the Comptroller of Water Rights and provincial and federal agencies.

The purpose of the potential changes is to address a dam safety risk at the La Joie Dam related to seepage, which causes concerns in relation to seismic events.  BC Hydro Dam Safety has recommended a modified reservoir operation of Downton Reservoir, to reduce the reservoir elevation level from 749.81 m to  734 m, as an interim measure to mitigate the seismic risks identified at La Joie Dam until capital upgrades can be initiated and completed in approximately 10 to 15 years’ time.  This modified reservoir operation results in ~50% reduction in active storage volume in Downton.  The proposed changes will not impact the existing Water Use Plan order. 

Public safety is the number one priority for BC Hydro, and BC Hydro’s rigorous Dam Safety Program ensures that the dam will remain safe.  The Dam Safety Program involves regular inspection of the dams to ensure safety in the event of earthquake or flood.  The program compares the condition of BC Hydro dams against current national and international best practices and continuously upgrades the dams on this basis.

The La Joie Dam remains safe under normal operating loads. As noted above, there are concerns for the safety of the dam when subjected to large seismic loads when the reservoir is high. Keeping the reservoir low will enable the dam to withstand a large seismic event.  Regular maintenance and monitoring by Dam Safety will continue at La Joie.

If you have any questions please contact me.

Sincerely,

Judy Dobrowolski

 Judy Dobrowolski

Senior Stakeholder Engagement Advisor

Capital Projects Communications  
 
BC Hydro
333 Dunsmuir Street, 15th Floor
Vancouver, B.C.  V6B 5R3

Time to Deal with Trees and Our Favorite Topic.....

I'd like to wish everyone a Happy Easter!  If you are coming to the Bridge River Valley, don't forget to stop by the Gold Bridge Community Club on Sunday at 10 am for Pancake Breakfast and Easter Egg Hunt, followed by the Haylmore site cleanup and a Community Garden organizing meeting.  - Debbie

Time to deal with fir infected with Douglas Fir Bark Beetle
If you have a property on Gun Lake and haven't read some of my previous posts on the Douglas Fir Bark Beetle and its spread in our area, please see this link:

 http://www.debbiedemare.com/2013/09/important-lake-property-owners-on.html

The time is now to cut down and either burn, discard in the transfer station or remove the bark.  This beetle will be flying in May and will infect other fir trees within 8-10 feet.  Once in, your tree or your neighbor's tree is dead, it's over!

Our favorite Topic....Hurley River Rd.
MLA Sturdy supported by MLA Tegart have been working on our behalf on our requests to have the Hurley River Rd. put in the jurisdiction of one ministry and also to have a more consistent, overall level of maintenance on the road.  I received a copy of a letter to one of our property owners from their MLA and I quote:
"This ministry and the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure are currently engaged in discussions focused on providing a more consistent level of road maintenance across the entire 49 kms of Hurley River Road. Both agencies have heard from the public and stakeholders, and we are facilitating a "one window" approach to government, where one local government office (either in Merritt or Squamish) would field all call regarding road maintenance issues.

The two agencies expect to have an arrangement in place to address many of the issues that have been raised by late April 2014..."

This letter was sent on March 27 and signed by an Assistant Deputy Minister.

So folks, fingers crossed something happens and delivers a consistent level of maitnenance throughout the road.  This will support many different aspects of the well being of the valley!

Lone Goat Snowmobile Trail and Cabin - On the way to a Sec. 56 status

Click here for the answer to.............What is a Section 56 you ask?

The SLRD received a referral notice from the MFLNRO Recreation Sites & Trails requesting opinion on a potential Sec. 56 status for the Lone Goat Snowmobile Trail & Cabin.  When staff asked me about it,  my first question was has the BRV Snowmobile Club also been consulted.  Turns out the Ministry official did not have current contact information for the Club so I was able to put them in touch with Brian Stuart, the current secretary of the Club.

My understanding is that the Ministry and the Club have had a long discussion and the Club has given their two thumbs up on the legal establishment of the Trail.  Later this year they will likely negoatiate a partnership agreement with the Ministry.  Very positive step for our area and the BRV Snowmobile Club..  SLRD also gave their approval of the idea.

Future for Independent Power Projects - Run of the River etc. in our area
Those of you wondering if we might land up with more IPP's in our area in the short/medium term might want to read this article.
http://www.vancouversun.com/touch/story.html?id=8855299

Leftover Piles of Timber and Slash from Tyaughton Lake Fire 2009
Over the last several years I have communicated with MOFLNRO re the leftover piles of slash & timber at the north end of Gun Lake.  Nothing really happened with them. Recently the SLRD Board got behind the request at my prompting as this is a fire hazard in our area.  This is the response we recently received.

Letter from MFLNRO re piles of slash around Gun Lake


Did you know?   Click here:  A Guide to Building Permits

Tyaughton Lake - Gun Creek neighborhood issues

Tyax Resort OCP Amendment/Rezoning and issues related to it

The SLRD received an application for a rezoning and OCP amendment regarding the Tyax Lodge property (Site A) and an adjacent property (Site B) .The amendmentapplication requests zoning to allow additional staff accommodation to be constructed on both properties. A dormitory style building was proposed for the Tyax Lodge property along with office and storage uses related to the helicopter operations at Site A, and a multi-unit housing building is proposed to be constructed on Lot 6 at Site B. SLRD staff have developed draft amendment bylaws for the OCP (Bylaw 1305) and Zoning Bylaw (Bylaw 1306) as per the Board’s resolution of December 16, 2013

The Electoral Area Directors Committee  recommended to the SLRD Board to require that in order for the Bylaw to proceed, Report from Agenda (incl.Maps)

a) restrictive covenant is executed to formalize the exclusion zone identified in the 2011 McClung Report for the Tyax Lodge property (PID 002-306-441).

b. Receipt of reports for both Site A (PID 002-306-441) and B (024-877-646) indicating

assurances from a professional engineer that the multiple unit accommodation,

accesses, driveways and other intended uses are “safe for the uses intended”.

c. A restrictive covenant is executed to ensure that staff housing is the primary use for the proposed new buildings with the option that the property owner could approach the SLRD in the future to amend the covenant if necessary.

d. A restrictive covenant is executed regarding the terms and conditions for a

campground use in the exclusion zone, along with a geotechnical report providing

assurances from a professional engineer that summer camping is “safe for the use

intended”.

e. An assessment of the septic situation will be required for the existing and proposed campground use on the Tyax Lodge property (PID 002-306-441). This assessment must determine what the existing systems can handle in addition to what would be required with the proposed expanded campground of up to 50 campsites.

Tyax subsequently suspended the process in order to rework aspects of it.

During this process I did receive a fair amount of input/feedback.

One of the issues that was raised is the SLRD notification process.  I went back to the staff and asked them for an explanation of the notification of public hearing process, here it is:

“Hello Director Demare,

Here is a summary of the Local Government Act requirements and the notification process for the Tyax application:

Based on the comments received by the SLRD recently there appears to be a difference between the expectations of residents and property owners at Tyaughton Lake, and an understanding of the requirements of the Local Government Act, which legislates the notification procedures for public hearings.

The Local Government Act (LGA) requires that notice of public hearing be given in accordance with Section 892, which includes a notice published in at least two consecutive issues of a newspaper with the last publication appearing not less than three and not more than 10 days before the public hearing.

The notice of the public hearing must also be mailed in accordance with the SLRD Procedures Bylaw No. 929, which states that the notice of public hearing shall be mailed to the owners of the parcels that are within 150 m of the boundary of a parcel under application.

It should be noted that the Local Government Act requirements do not include a process for notifying property owners about an application except in preparation for a public hearing.

The SLRD has met and exceeded the requirements of the LGA with two consecutive notices in each of the three following newspapers:  the Lillooet News, the Pique, and the Squamish Chief.  A letter was mailed (on February 25) to properties within 150 m of the subject properties in the application with a notice about the public hearing.

The SLRD has gone beyond the requirements of the LGA in several other instances.  In December 2013, the SLRD also requested that Tyax post a notice on their website regarding the rezoning application.  The SLRD created a project page on its website for the rezoning application where information, staff reports, and draft bylaws could be found.  The SLRD has also communicated the notification of the public hearing through the Electoral Area A Director, and Area A email group, and the Bridge River Valley Community Association.

Once Tyax Wilderness Resort resubmits their revised application, I will see what I can do to enhance the required notifications including:  

• One month notification prior to Public Hearing
• Signage
• A broader notification via mail

I must do this in the context of the full board and I cannot by myself make this happen, but I will put it forward.

The second big issue to come out of the feedback from the original rezoning application was a consistent concern regarding the level of activity of both the floatplane and helicopters.  I heard from many property owners their concerns that the noise and activity on the lake is impacting their enjoyment of their property.  I did seek information from Transport Canada, this is the response:

"Thank you for your telephone inquiry of March 27 requesting information on float plane activity on Lake Tyaughton, here is some information.

At the outset, I should explain the role of Transport Canada. In the case of civil aviation in Canada, Transport Canada’s focus is on overseeing a safe and secure, efficient and environmentally responsible transportation system. Our emphasis is on safety. The Aeronautics Act and Canadian Aviation Regulations provide a comprehensive framework through which safety is regulated. Included are regulations dealing with minimum altitudes of aircraft, aircraft noise emissions and aircraft operating procedures.

There are no Aeronautical Regulations (Canadian Aviation Regulations – CARs) that prohibit a float plane from using a specific lake or water surface.  Some lakes in BC, like ones that are used as a water supply for example, often have Provincial or National Park restrictions to motorized vessels.  However, there are no current restrictions to float plane operations on Tyaughton Lake, or any of the lakes in that area. 

Restrictions to Flight operations is strictly a Federal Issue.  They are regulated primarily by the Aeronautics Act, the Canadian Aviation Regulations and associated Standards.  Other than at large busy airports, there are no noise abatement procedures for small airports or on a ‘small remote lake’ such as Tyaughton.  The Province, Municipalities or local authorities do not have the jurisdiction to control Aviation matters.  BC Ministry of Environment, through  BC Provincial Parks have land control authority which might prevent docking or off loading around a lake, but not the landing and taking off from the surface.  Any restrictions on land use would be equally applicable to cars, camping, cottages, or other land uses and users.

As mentioned before certain lakes and watersheds that are primary sources for drinking water for a large population can be restricted to only Non-motorized vessels. e.g. Capilano watershed, which is the source of drinking water for a large part of the Lower Mainland.  As a float plane is considered a vessel when it operates on the water, the boating regulations apply.  Any change in vessel regulations would effect all other boating users on the lake as well. 

Wildlife control areas such as bird sanctuaries, and Noise sensitive areas, can be listed on Aviation maps, but they only warn pilots to avoid such areas and be aware of the sensitivities.  There are no Canadian Aviation Regulation (CARs) prohibiting the low flight or landing in these areas.

As the summer days get longer and start earlier, the residents in the area can expect the possibility of increased float plane operations.  This is also true of increased vehicle traffic on the roads, and recreational boating on the water.  Examination of available maps and photos indicates that there are a considerable number of roads, cottages, and docks around the lake.  Restriction of use of this public area to one group of users as opposed to all users is not in accordance with keeping open access to all Canadians.

Float plane operations are only allowed during daylight hours.  As you know, in the summer the daylight starts early and lasts later.  Although the Pilot may not be violating any CARs, early morning arrivals and departures over residential areas (or temporary residential areas, i.e. campsites) often strain the good neighbour policy.  The Pilot can be asked to consider the other users of a recreation area and conduct his/her activities accordingly.

Again the best solution is to keep open communication with all the users of this lake community, and come to mutual consensus for everyone’s acceptable use.  Transport Canada should not be the facilitator of these discussions, nor I believe, would the BC Ministry of Environment want to get involved.  However, I hope you find this information to be helpful and a useful tool when communicating with the Tyaughton Lake community."

I have checked with the SLRD staff and as of today's date (April 15) Tyax Wilderness Resort has not resubmitted their rezoning application.  As I indicated at the time they suspended the orginal application, this is an opportunity for the Tyaughton Lake neighborhood to work out between everyone a good neighbor policy through dialogue with each other.   With this in mind the Tyaughton Lake Ratepayer's Association have had at least one meeting between property owners and Tyax Wilderness Resort.    

It has been reported that one thing was clear at the meeting, and that is that Tyax Air and to a lesser extent TLH is a major concern for the vast majority of property owners in the area of the lake.  TLH is willing to work with us to try to mitigate some of the disturbance that they cause, we’re investigating ways that can happen.  One of the first things TLH has committed to preparing is a summary of their operating plan when it comes to the helicopter and why.  According to the Tyaughton Lake Ratepayers Association this will hopefully allow for continued dialogue and working out of a good neighbor policy.  In addtion, I understand,  Al Macdonald (TRA Director at Large) has been asked to lead a committee to meet and discuss property owners concerns regarding Tyax Air use of Tyaughton Lake.  

This is where things stand to the best of my understanding at the moment.  I continue to strongly encourage dialogue and accomodation between all neighbors and businesses.  If there is anything I can do to assist at this time please let me know.

South Chilcotin Mountain Park Plan - DRAFT available for comment until May 30

You will find the plan and the instructions on how to comment at this link:
http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/bcparks/planning/mgmtplns/lillooet/lillooet_mp.html

I have reviewed this document and have drafted some comments.  The SLRD planning staff will also be reviewing in the context of the Official Community Plan and other planning documents.  I will post ALL of that once complete.

BC Hydro Payment in Lieu of Taxes - Everyone Wants their Piece of the Pie!

My goodness time goes by so quickly....this is a pretty extensive update and it has been a while since I wrote a blog.   I have probably forgotten things I wanted to tell you.  If you think of something you want information or an update on please email me and I will add a post or two.  

BC Hydro Payment in Lieu of Taxes - Everyone wants some of it!

The District of Lillooet has submitted a letter to the SLRD board saying that they have initiated boundary expansion to take over the Bridge River Generating Station.   Following the normal provincial government guidelines, this could, if the province approves it, net Lillooet approximately $330,000 in revenue.  In addition, they have requested that in the interim that the SLRD Board allocate $100,000 to capital upgrades and operational costs of the Lillooet Recreation Centre and Pool from the BC Hydro Payment in Lieu of Taxes (PILT). 

So if they are granted the boundary expansion, the SLRD would lose this $330,000 as a revenue source.  Currently this money is allocated in a formula, negotiated by our former Regional District director, Russ Oakley.  Most of this money goes to services that look after the entire SLRD such as General Government and Planning.  The current budget is around $830,000, so you can see that a $300,000 hit would be very very significant and would most certainly impact the SLRD’s ability to use those to services to provide specific services to the Electoral Areas such as ours.    Area A also receives direct support through two different Select Funds which is BC Hydro PILT funds and this would most likely also suffer a hit in this scenario.

I have submitted a  Director's Report requesting that an additional $100,000 of the PILT funds be allocated to assist our area in two services, the Gold Bridge Water Service (operational) and the Bralorne Sewer (replacement).  This report has been referred to budget discussions.

It is unlikely I will support the $100,000 allocation from the BC Hydro PILT to Lillooet for their pool, while I sympathize, I believe they are not due such a huge proportion of the BC Hydro PILT funds.  There may be other ways they could be assisted.  When it comes to the satellite expansion they are initiating, I am also not, on your behalf supporting this until I am assured that Area A’s financial interests and service delivery are protected. Time to correct this fairness issue for a generation to come!    Let me know what you think.

Bralorne Items:
Bralorne Sewer System Replacement
Link to updated engineering study.  This study includes some of the history of how we got to this place.   http://www.scribd.com/doc/95506532/Bralorne-Community-Sewer-System-Assesment-Study-Update2    In 2012 Gas Tax Funding was applied for and was not successful.

Thanks to the SLRD Utilities Staff we are starting to develop a manageable approach.  To start with it is proposed that an infiltration study will be done.  This is where they put the cameras in the pipes and see exactly what is going on.  The results of this could allow for prioritizing certain areas for replacement.  Then replacement of collection system could be done in phases.  This would be more affordable for the Bralorne property owners.   There is also another intake of Gas Tax funding coming and our proposal will be current and ready to go - shovel ready as they put it.   More on this to come.

Boultbee Memorial Church

This year the Bralorne Bridge River Valley Community Church Society decided to dissolve.  This Society, its members and volunteers are responsible for the Church we have today through a major restoration that was done some years ago.   Many community members sacrificed a great deal of time and effort, and many many community members past and present donated to the fundraising to make the church we have today possible.   Our community must remember their effort and  be eternally grateful for the job they did in restoring the Church.

It also came to light this year that the ownership status of the property and Church is an interesting one.  The parcel is untitled; it does not have a PID or ROLL number or title registered at the Land Titles office.  It is Crown land, owned by the Crown, but was dedicated as PARK via subdivision Plan 25011.

The SLRD was granted possession and control of the parcel for the purpose of a park.  “Possession and Control” means that the SLRD cannot dispose of the land (the SLRD does not own it), but does have the ability to use it for park purposes only.  The SLRD is further investigating this to determine exactly what this means.  The SLRD, through Area A Select Funds is taking some immediate steps to determine current condition of Church and is funding a Heritage Consultant (Susan Medville) to:

1)Inventory and Conservation  of Documents and Photographs

Inventory and conserve historic documents and photographs within the Church including numerous photograph albums, photographs currently displayed on the walls of the church, correspondence, and relevant Church records.

2)Inventory of Historic Items

Create a database inventory of historic items within the Church. Including but not limited to, furniture, instruments and fixtures.

3) Develop an Operations Management Plan for the Church that addresses operations, as the building is currently equipped

Some immediate physical concerns are being addressed including getting rid of a cluster fly infestation and replacing the hot water tank along with some other plumbing.   It has also been determined that the filler pipe to the oil tank is loose and some investigation will need to occur next spring.  For now, there is some oil in the tank and we are hoping events in the Church over the winter can be heated with this oil.    In addition, the Church has for the interim been added to the SLRD Insurance Policy.

Also at its meeting on October 28, the SLRD Board decided to sign a one year management agreement with the BRVCA to ensure there is a local caretaker organization which the ownership issue is figured out.  The BRVCA hopes that the fledgling Heritage Committee will be able to give advice and oversee the management of the Church going forward, for now though, the BRVCA Board of Directors will ensure the matters related to the care of the Church are looked after.  Funding for operations is a concern and the BRVCA has a restricted set of accounts for the Church so that all money raised and all money spent will come directly out of these accounts.  Any users of the Church for events and so on will be asked to do what they can through donations etc to assist in the operations of the Church.  If you wish to use the Church please contact the Community Resource Building at (250)238-2534 or bridgerivervalley@gmail.com  for information on policies and procedures regarding the Church’s use. 

This Church is a priceless treasure and we hope the community will continue to support it as it always has.  The BRVCA has put the original Church website back online live.  This website will need to be updated, however it is interesting to look at.  The website is www.bralornechurch.ca and there is a way to donate right there and then.  Keep in mind there is no service established to tax to support the Church, so no matter who owns it,  funds will be needed to operate it and keep it in good condition.  Please consider making a donation.

Gun Lake items:

South End Boat Launch Update
As you know the south end Boat Launch at Gun Lake was damaged by ice last winter.  It is very difficult to use.   A small group of Gun Lake people met in late August to discuss its short term and longer term maintenance.  

The area of the launch and the dock that was put there is actually governed by the Water Act.  Any replacement will need to go through the steps to obtain a tenure/notification under the water act.

The property around the boat launch is crown land.  It was formerly a Recreation Site (Min. of Forests), however that site has been deactivated by the MInistry of Forests, Trails & Recreation.

This leaves the whole thing in a bit of a no-man's land.  Options include:
1)Lobby the Recreation & Trails (MOF) to reinstate the Rec Site & maintain the boat launch
2)Set up an SLRD service & tax GL property owners to maintain
3)Local organization takes over, however will still need to do fundraising to maintain & put in proper tenure/management plan documents
4)"Someone" fixes it, however care must be taken because individuals known to have worked on it may find themselves liable for any accidents etc there

One of the action items out of our meeting this fall with lake property owners and boat launch users was to conduct a survey to see what users of the boat launch think should be done.  SO HAVE YOUR SAY!! 

SURVEY RE GUN LAKE BOAT LAUNCH SOUTH END

Motorboat Noise Bylaw
While I was at the boat launch for the meeting I noticed a sign listing this bylaw:  Motorboat Noise Bylaw # 396.  I wan't aware this bylaw existed and am sharing it for information purposes.


Update:  Run of the River Projects

At UBCM this year, I ran into the representative of Innergex and asked him for an update on their water investigative licences in Area A.   The company has been holding water license applications for several years on:

- Cadwallader Creek and Noel Creek

- Tyaughton Creek

- Gun Greek

- Hurley River

(applications for two other streams in Area A, Bridge River and Nichols Creek, have been recently taken off this list)

You can find information about all active water license applications in BC through this database http://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/wtrwhse/water_licences.input .

Innergex has installed water gauges in these streams, and may occasionally conduct non-intrusive environmental research activities (such as fish searches or other field

work), as is allowed and required under the conditions of application. A certain level of research is necessary to keep the applications active. A Water License Application does not allow for any permanent construction, clearing of alterations. Neither does the possession of a Water License Application imply that a project will automatically follow and will actually be developed. In fact most applications will not evolve into a run-of-river project. This all depends on technical-environmental –financial-social & First Nation-political factors.

The Innergex representative subsequently provided this information and I quote:  "Going to the development stage would imply starting the BC environmental assessment process with much more intense field work and environmental studies, as well as public and First Nations consultations. There are currently no plans for the 5 streams mentioned to move to the development stage and start the official BC environmental

assessment."(underline his emphasis).

You can find information about all development projects in BC that are in environmental assessment through this database:

http://a100.gov.bc.ca/appsdata/epic/html/deploy/epic_project_list_report.html .

MLA Jackie Tegart Visits

On October 18 and 19, the Bridge River Valley, its residents including Sal and I had the pleasure and privilege of hosting our MLA Jackie Tegart and her Constituency Assistant, Lori Pilon.  

MLA Tegart earned my respect by choosing to drive over the Duffy Lake Rd. from Ashcroft, and then travel over the Hurley (I met them and did it with them) to Bralorne.  She definately got "the feel" of the situation:-)  I think she also clearly understands the linkage of the condition of the Hurley River Rd. with our economic and community viability.

When we arrived in Bralorne, we took THE most amazing heli tour with Kokanee Helicopters (sponsored by community fundraising).  The  opportunities for back country recreation are undeniable and this heli trip (aside from knocking my socks off) really cemented that understanding for me.

We also had dinner with members of the Bralorne community, toured the Bralorne Gold Mine operation, had a public meeting, shared the experience of living on Gun Lake and toured her around the Lake - on the Lake. It was chilly but worth it so that she could see the extent and type of residential buildings on Gun Lake.  

MLA Tegart made a report to the Mountain Telegraph.  Here is the link.

By the way I encourage you to support the Mountain Telegraph - it can be mailed to your home and costs $66/year.  Contact mountaintelegaph.editor@gmail.com.


Our favorite topic:  Roads - Hurley River Rd.

I have been in regular contact with MLA Tegart and her office.  They advise they have been working with MLA Jordan Sturdy and MOTI staff to implement some improvements.  In particular, MLA Sturdy is going to be taking the lead on both short term (this winter) and longer term (1 to 3 years) maintenance, repair and upgrading of the Hurley Road from Pemberton Meadow Road to Gold Bridge. 

This temporary and informal realignment of responsibilities will address one of the administrative issues that has been raised by constituents which is that the Hurley Road spans two provincial ridings.  The other administrative issue that has been raised by myself and other constituents is that the Hurley Road falls under two different Ministries (Transportation and Forestry), and two different forestry districts (Cascade and Sea to Sky) in two different forestry regions (South Coast and Thompson/Okanagan) making coordination, setting priorities, and budgeting for repairs and maintenance difficult. MLA Sturdy is working to have the road put under one jurisdiction.

Also, for your information, the maintenance and priority issues that have been brought to the MLA’s attention over the summer by residents and by myself include:

• Dust control in appropriate locations in the summer months
• Road to be opened by the long weekend in May
• Km 13 to km 18 (Pemberton side) needs more material and some kind of surface stabilization
• The switchback section needs more frequent gradings than it has received this year
• The middle (MOT/public section) requires at least two gradings per year
• The north end section is generally good with one grading per year except the hill coming into Gold Bridge

These maintenance and priority issues have been discussed with MOTI and efforts to work them into budgets and work plans will be made.  MLA Sturdy will oversee this planning process over the winter with MLA Tegart’s support as required. 

I am hopeful, but like you, will wait and see what happens.  I want to say Thank You to the two MLA's for their thoughtfulness and their responsiveness.  I do believe we have been understood for the first time in a long time!

As you know, I have been running a Have Your Say Survey regarding this road and here are the responses thus far (I have removed one that was inappropriate).

Less bumpy, but remain a wilderness trail. DO NOT PAVE the Hurley River Forestry Road.

4/9/2013 11:18 AMView Responses

Consistent from one end to the other, top coated so the sub grade is not exposed, and maintained regularly by one jurisdiction.

2/9/2013 1:18 PMView Responses

a reasonably graded gravel road with regular maintenance ( 4-6 gradings) through out the summer months. When and as needed it should be redressed with suitable gravel material. It should be open to traffic from the May long weekend until closed by natural snowfall.

31/8/2013 1:06 PMView Responses

paved up the switchbacks on the Pemberton side to Railway Pass then back to dirt road again. In the winter it would be plowed that far with a parking lot at the end that you have to buy a season's pass for, limited parking of maybe 60 with a reserved spot for me ...... and groomed the whole way to Gold Bridge and Bralorne. No big deal, right? :)

29/8/2013 6:37 PMView Responses

addressed with a new top lift of compressed gravel. Grading is no longer addressing the exposed boulders on various sections of the road surface. Potholes are becoming large and posing a hazard for vehicles. The road sees increased use and is a main access for many residents and visitors.

28/8/2013 7:15 AMView Responses

...Maintained by one authority instead of three. Having three bodies manage the road seems like a set up to allow only 1/3rd of the road to be worked on per year. If only 1/3 is worked on, they can say something has been done and the other two authorities can save the funds that would otherwise be spent on the actual road. Having only a part of the road in usable shape is of little use to those who would drive this road and come to the area and spend some $, be that home owners or visitors. Having the Hurley in such rough shape also discourages future home owners from buying in the area, as the other option (highway 40) is a lot longer (from the lower mainland) and unpaved for significant sections. Put the entire road under one jurisdiction, make it the goal to have the snow cleared for the May long weekend (when its safe to do so) and grade it in June and again in the fall at least. Also think about bringing the east Hurley up to the same standard as the rest of the Hurley. Also while we're at it, pave the entire length of highway 40 between Lillooet and Gold Bridge. We should have at least one decent way into the valley!

26/8/2013 9:13 PMView Responses

1) Not necessarily paved, but graded and maintained in good condition and kept clear/accessible all year long. 2) Have one entity responsible for the entire stretch of road

26/8/2013 1:15 PMView Responses

graded more frequently

25/8/2013 6:15 AMView Responses

Paved! Of course we know that will not happen but if it was at least kept like Road 40 that would at least make it tolerable. As it is presently it is a nightmare for at least 50 percent of the distance.

24/8/2013 7:16 PMView Responses

1. The entire road would be consolidated under a single mgmt. umbrella. 2. Maintained and repaired because in numerous areas of the road, the gravel surface is completely gone so that the sub-grade is exposed and the sub-grade is not a satisfactory driving surface! 3. Acknowledged that this Road is not only a forestry service road, but is a multi-use road of importance to our community and should be treated as such! If there is not presently a suitable designation which recognizes this reality, then a suitable designation must be created!

23/8/2013 5:46 PMView Responses

3 times per year completely graded from Railway Bridge on the Pemberton side to the bottom of the hill on the Goldbridge side. Timing would be when the road is reopened in Spring, prior to Aug. long weekend and prior to Sept. or Thanksgiving weekend. If 3 times per year are not possible a minimum of 2 complete gradings Pemberton side to Goldbridge side per year; each prior to July and Sept. weekends. The switchback Pemberton side, I believe 13 to 18 KM, is virtually impossible to grade properly because of exposed rock. This section and others sections with exposed rock need to be torn up or reworked so that proper grading is possible. Scheduled grading and some improvement to the Hurley would significantly reduce what is now a high rate of vehicle breakdowns and high vehicle maintenance costs to those travelling this route.

23/8/2013 12:54 AMView Responses

a good gravel road , open June 1- until Oct 31 or first measureable snowfall

23/8/2013 12:19 AMView Responses

Gravel of 2" minus on South end to a minimum depth of 6" (15 cm). First 7 km of North end to have dust control to help prevent washboard. I do not support paving as the grades are too steep & it would become very dangerous.

23/8/2013 11:12 AMView Responses

Graded after every long weekend in the summer and never paved!

23/8/2013 9:41 AMView Responses

Maintained to the same level for its entire length. This would include the section known as the east Hurley, which needs to be brushed/widened and graded most of its length to get up to the standard of the main Hurley. In addition to that, I would make the down hill section to Gold Bridge as one way, which would be down hill only. I would encourage out going traffic from the valley to take the paved road up to Bralorne and then out the east Hurley. This would not only be easier on vehicles climbing up and out of the valley on a paved road, but also the main Hurley, as you wouldn't have vehicles tearing up the road as it they try and climb up and out the valley. Coming down a rough road is much easier than climbing one. I know it's a pipe dream, but dreaming is free right!

6/5/2013 8:21 AMView Responses

a well maintained gravel road that receives regular grading. The large rocks in certain areas make travel in anything but a 4x4 truck very difficult, hard on the vehicle and dangerous. It does not warrant pavement, but a good quality gravel road would be appreciated.

2/5/2013 10:37 AMView Responses

Paved one lane on the hills, graded regularly across the top (and maybe sealed? not sure what that is called, but the road was better the year of the fire when they sprayed it for dust).

1/5/2013 8:22 PMView Responses

Paved and open year round.

30/4/2013 7:56 PMView Responses

open all year long (you did say perfect world) and maintained to a reasonable standard. I'm not suggesting paving it by any means but at least grade it so that potholes and rocks are not so dangerous as to potentially wreck your vehicle.

30/4/2013 4:58 PMView Responses

open year round, maintained for speeds of xx km per hour by 4wd vehicle, gravel acceptable

30/4/2013 10:27 AMView Responses

A seasonal, reasonably maintained road administered under a single jurisdiction.

30/4/2013 10:20 AMView Responses

...a rustic road; summer driving only is fine by me, snowmobile access in winter (legally) so Pembies can day-trip to the Mineshaft Pub; grading/ditching done once the snow has melted...once a year might be good? (I'm generally ignorant of the specifics.) In past years, the annual reopening of the Hurley was a bit of a celebration, that summer had finally arrived. I like that the Hurley is a bit of an adventure. I don't really like that my vehicle is never quite the same again after traveling it, but that does make me pause, think, respect the road, the weather, the land, and the journey--to appreciate these as true influences on our lives. The Hurley road used to feature in my dreams when I held property here but lived in the city; as did bears, or apprehension of them. Both were symbolically gates and gatekeepers in my dreams, challenging me whether I had it in me to make the passage to the valley...not just for vacations, but apparently, permanently. (I guess I had it in me!)  PS: You will notice that I'm not on the turn-the-Hurley-into-a-four-lane-freeway committee. I realize that the seasonality of the road cramps the style of others who have a long detour to make when it's not passable to rubber tire traffic, but I am sure they will speak up for themselves. This is my own personal view, obviously.

30/4/2013 8:38 AMView Responses

properly developed and maintained as a gravel road only with no posts on corners.

30/4/2013 7:48 AMView Responses

Left exactly as it currently is.

30/4/2013 3:49 AMView Responses

Graded more often.With the East Hurley, widened in dangerous spots, and where the river is undermining the road, a new culvert and bridge put in.

29/4/2013 10:10 PMView Responses

re-gravelled on the pemberton side with dust control to "hold it together". Balance graded on a bi-weekly basis during the summer. Opened for the May long weekend. We need to have one government agency overseeing the complete road. MOTI is in the road business so one would think they would have more resources than the MOF???

29/4/2013 9:09 PMView Responses

A maintained (graded every 2 weeks) gravel surface (not cobble stone) road with single lane pavement on each hill. This would allow drivers to use the pavement when there is no oncoming traffic and shift one wheel onto the gravel when encountering another vehicle, thus eliminating the sever wear on the steep hills out of Pemberton and Goldbridge. If paving is deemed unrealistic, then salt sealing the hills for the summer would reduce dust and minimize wear on the gravel surface.

29/4/2013 8:48 PMView Responses

paved

29/4/2013 7:55 PMView Responses

graded to an acceptable standard. The unpaved portions of hwy #40 would be a good example. I

29/4/2013 4:59 PMView Responses

You can still have your say:   Click here to answer.   

I also encourage you  any time you see a road maintenance issue on public roads (not FSR's), such as the middle portion of the Hurley River Rd.,  to fill in a Public Communication Record. This form goes to Interior Roads, local and management and a whole variety of ministry officials.  Excellent tool to advise them what is not right on roads!    http://www.interiorroads.com/pcr.php

BC Regional Climate Summaries
A set of regional climate summaries for the 8 resource regions of British Columbia was recently launched at http://www.pacificclimate.org/resources/regional-climate-summaries

These summaries discuss future climate projections and potential impacts, in the context of the historical climate for each region and province-wide climate change.

Click to read the LATEST OFFICIAL SLRD AREA A UPDATE